Sunday, 5 June 2011

Migration Pulse blog - Migrants Rights Network blog.

Sandra Peňaloza Rice
Sandra Peňaloza Rice is one of the volunteers contributing her thoughts on the Migration Pulse blog.
Nowadays “volunteering” has become a very important part of our society, not only to reflect the amount of support communities and disadvantage individuals need, but also to reflect the solidarity and compassion volunteers have for the society. It doesn’t matter if a volunteer helps somebody to do some shopping, enjoy quick chat or maybe going abroad and spend weeks helping whole communities devastated by a natural disaster. In all cases somebody has given their time (in many cases money)  to help somebody else and the outcome of this work gives back not only an extremely  rewarding feeling, but also unforgettable experience.
After the announcement some months ago by the previous government to force everybody who is applying to become a British citizen to first complete voluntary work  for 6 months, the theme of volunteering has been brought to the discussion table. Since then voluntary organisations, groups and migrant organisations including MRN organised forums to discuss this issue and created the platform to respond on behalf of the organisations and migrants directly involved.
At this time the afore mentioned regulation has been thrown out by the new coalition government. Nevertheless important issues which might prevent migrants getting involved in volunteering should be still considered and addressed not only by organisations who look for volunteers, but also for migrants themselves. 
Engage to change publication coverAccording to the latest report “Engage to Change Migrant and Refugee Voices on Active citizenship” by MRN and MRCF last July, migrants and refugees mainly volunteer in migrant/refugee/asylum seekers organisations, local and community groups, voluntary organisations, faith institutions and trade unions. The roles vary, although they often include interpreting, providing language support, advocacy and campaigning, case work, training, cooking, cleaning, administrative jobs, organising events, sitting on group’s management committees, mentoring and befriending.
The report also mentions that some of the principal motivations for migrant to volunteering are to try to “make a difference” and “contribute to the community”. Although this represents a “challenging experience” many migrant volunteers would recommend volunteering to their contemporaries.
Volunteering helps you to gain experience, meet people, in order to better understand life in the UK, improve skills, and above all is a very rewarding. The positive effects of volunteering are undeniable, however migrants face many barriers to volunteer - from fear, lack of confidence, culture, traditions, language, lack of time, lack of experience to find the right placement. On the other hand many organisations which are interested to promote their opportunities in the migrant communities; find themselves struggling to get the attention and interest in the communities.
A small mapping exercise between migrants online showed that the majority of migrants and refugees work as volunteers in organisations related to migrants, refugees, asylum seekers and in the care sector and there are a number of positive stories of migrants who decided to volunteer and gained not only experience but this also led the way to high education or paid work.
About ten years ago, volunteering wasn’t that known between migrants; I certainly remember when I was living in Essex, supporting a voluntary program as a full time volunteer: some of my friends, who came to the UK to study or work didn’t have any spare time left to do anything else and definitely thought volunteering wasn’t an option for them.  
My first experience volunteering in the UK and being part of a wonderful team of volunteers and staff from many different countries was one of the best experiences of my life. Although it was certainly challenging it also gave me huge satisfaction and it helped me to understand the value of volunteering. Back in my home country I volunteered in local projects supporting communities and homeless children, and then back in the UK I found more and more opportunities with different organisations and groups. After some months volunteering I found a paid job supporting a voluntary project, which I still enjoy.
I have been working with volunteers for two years now and I can understand the difficulties for migrants who want to volunteer, but for various reasons they cannot do it; many times potential volunteers come back to me frustrated because they didn’t get their CRB’s after 4-5 months waiting; or those potential volunteers who's level of confidence is extremely low because of  the language problems (even though holding universities degrees from their home countries) as well as migrant workers who would like to volunteer, but don’t have the time and energy to do it after long hours of work.   
The “volunteering road” for migrants can be very difficult to walk, loads of stones, many roads, and plenty of obstacles; but when they decide to take it there is no way back. Their life’s can change so positively in many dramatic ways in just a matter of months.
At the same time having people from different countries, culture and languages volunteering enriches the diversity of the community and society, and encourages respect and tolerance.


Thursday, 5 May 2011

Pictures from "Responsible Partnerships" Exhibition 2011 London

Migrants Supporting Migrants participated at the UBM Responsible Partherships Exhibiton last March 2011. 
MSM delegates attended: Anysie Kankindi, Cesar Urquizo, Negat Tafesse, Sanoj Tulachan and Sandra Penaloza


Responsible Business 2011 - A new two-day,not-for-profit event developed through a strategic partnership between UBM and Business in the Community (BITC) consisting of UBM's launch Responsible Partnerships Exhibition and the inaugural BITC Responsible Business Convention


The inaugural UBM Responsible Partnerships Exhibition featured over 150 exhibitors from selected charities, voluntary organisations and social programmes as well as plenty of free seminars and workshops to help them develop the strategic alliances and business partnerships that will ultimately help to increase CSR activity and drive business forward. The exhibition was FREE TO ATTEND for all visitors.

watch the video:

 http://vimeo.com/22652255



Migrants Supporting Migrants

Stand Number
162
Online profile
MSM, a grass-root organisation based in Manchester, members comes from different cultures background and nationalities. Objectives; to advance the welfare and rights of migrants, to promote migrants workers contribution to the wellbeing of economic - social life; provide information, guidance and advice ensuring their rights and liberties are upheld.
Press releases
Feb 2011

"Migrant voices from the North"
"Migrant voices from the North"
“Migrants Voices from the North Project” is calling for volunteers
Commitment in Communities Volunteer Service (CICVS) is looking for volunteers who would like to get involved in this exciting opportunity;

The “Migrants Voices from the North” project in conjunction with Migrants Supporting Migrants and North Manchester Radio FM 106.6 aims to help refugees and migrants to integrate into British life, access information, advice and guidance and participate in local activities.

This 10 week project will start broadcasting from begining of March 2011.

We are looking for volunteers from a migrant/refugee background or volunteers whose main language is Polish, French, Spanish and Russian. Experience delivering radio programs is not necessary. Training, supervision and Criminal Record Bureau (CRB) checking will be provided.
If you are interested please contact Sandra at 0161 226 7364 sandra.rice@c-i-c.org.uk or Nick 0161 226 7162 or by email on admin@c-i-c.org.uk
Web: www.c-i-c.org.uk blog: http://cicvolunteering.blogspot.com/
www.migrantsupport.org.uk



It was excellent opportunity to meet people from other organisations, network and enjoy the vibrant athmosphere.

MSM had the support of Oxfam to participate in this event. 

Oxfam

Oxfam has been working to end poverty in the UK since 1996. We believe it is unacceptable that in a relatively wealthy country more than 13 million people still live in poverty. That’s one in five without enough to live on, discriminated against and stereotyped, forgotten by the government, and given far fewer opportunities than the rest.

Oxfam's work on tackling poverty in the UK aims to develop projects with people living in poverty to improve their lives and show how things can change. We also raise public and politicians' awareness of poverty and its causes, and lobby to bring about change.
www.oxfam.org.uk

MSM Planning weekend at the Trafford Hall, Chester













Tuesday, 12 April 2011

News and Updates 12th of April

France bans the Islamic veil

France is the first country to ban the Islamic veil. Starting the 11 April 2011. The law, which entered into effect on Monday 11 April 2011, makes it against the law for women to publicly wear the veil. Failure to obey the law can lead to a fine of approximately £135 (€150). Those who force Muslim women to wear the veil are likely to risk a €30,000 fine and a prison sentence for up to two years. Two women who were part of a protest outside Notre Dame were arrested yesterday.


My opinion

France, ‘Etat laïque’. France is a laic (= secular) state where no one has the right to exhibit his or her religious appartenance. As a Christian, I am not allowed to wear a big cross, as it is against the law. However, my religion is more permissive than Islam. Nevertheless, in my opinion, the ban on the Islamic veil could be seen as a  move towards social cohesion. A veil (especially the burqua) puts a barrier between the person who wears it and a person who would like to approach the Muslim woman. Lack of social interaction leads to social exclusion. We have seen that multiculturalism is hard (almost unlikely) to trigger social inclusion and integration. Maybe assimilation could be the answer?



Migration as a ping-pong tactic

What is happening with Tunisian migrants who make it to Italy, in Lampedusa? They want to go to France where most of their families are settled and where the language is not a problem. They want to get to Lyon, Marseille, Paris, or even Brussels. The city at the French border is Vintimille, a place where the Red Cross is waiting for them to take them to a centre where they can get washed, eat and get some new clothes. However, at the French border, the French police is present and sends the Tunisians back to Italy.


My opinion

We have seen that there is no common EU policy on asylum. All member states involved in the process are individualistic and on send to another country those who only want to survive the civil unrest from their home countries. The European Commission was a bit naïve when it stated that the social unrest would force the 27 member states to show some solidarity. The lack of solidarity is shown by the disputes between France and Italy concerning the visas.




UK: Abolition of the Certificate of Approval

At present, any non-EU immigrant needs a Certificate of Approval before getting married in the UK. This scheme will be abolished on 9 May 2011. After that date, the Church will have to give a licence to the couple willing to get married. The Church is allowed by the UKBA to refuse to marry a couple who is likely to be ‘bogus’.


My opinion

Sham marriages are a big problem in the UK. I read something about a sham marriage which took place at least once a week. It has to be tackled. But what is interested here is the way it is dealt with. It seems to me that the UKBA has enough of talking the issue and is putting the whole burden on the church. This shows two things:
-         the Church is to be converted into Police
-         the relation between Church and Politics are


Facts

UK: Changes to settlement rules

The rules for settlement changed on 6 April 2011. The changes are:
-         a new criminality threshold.  Applicants must now be clear of unspent convictions when they apply for settlement.
-         A new income requirement
-         Reform of the English language requirement. Migrants in Tier 1, Tier 2 and their precursor routes must now pass the Life in the UK test rather than an ESOL with citizenship course.
-          

 Author: Claudia Paraschivescu claudia.paraschivescu@gmail.com


Monday, 28 March 2011

News and Updates 28th of March


Muslims in France

In the past, the Muslim population from France used to be rather submissive and did not use to stand up for their rights. The new generation, which is more powerful, thinks that they have the right to fight for a better life and they do not accept to be disregarded in social, political and geographical spaces. However, not all the Muslims do something to improve their situation. Some of them deliberately choose to go against the French culture and do things to shock. 

My opinion

Even if they hold French nationality, the Muslism population is still seen in France as a ‘second hand’ population. Discriminated against, tey only get to do those jobs that ‘fully fledged’ Frenchmen would not do. They are still part of the precariat. France is a lot behind the UK in terms of integration of the Muslim. North-African workers in France are eligible for state-based social security. However, since it is linked to employment history, they can find themselves in a precarious status because of the discrimination they face in the labour market. The main question is whether the system of social protection is effective enough to provide them with security. However, even if discrimination on the labour market is a big issue in France, we should be honest and recognise that many Muslims do no do anything to get a job, but are happy to live on social benefits.


UK: Ban on takaway jobs for non-EEAcitizens

According to new rules, migrants outside the European Economic Area will not be allowed to work in the UK as chefs in takeway restaurants. A similar ban will cover other jobs such as hairdressers, beauty salon managers and estate agent starting April. Immigration Minister Damian Green: "These changes will allow firms to bring in people with necessary skills without migrants becoming the first resort to fill a wide range of available jobs. This government is also determined to get people back to work and provide business with the skills they need from the British workforce - reducing the need for migrants at the same time as we reduce their number."

My opinion

Given the current economic situation, where the unemployment is high, many tabloids refer to 'British jobs for British people'. However, I have one question: “Will British people work in the jobs which will no longer be available to non EEA migrants?”. Probably not.


UK: Tighter rules for student visas

Home Secretary Theresa May stated that that “too many were here to work and not to study”. In that respect, she announced to cut the number of student visas by up to 80,000. New rules concerning the level of English language, dependants, Tier 4 sponsors 5education providers) will be introduces in order to curb the numbers of non-genuine students. Shadow home secretary said that new rules should not damage the education industry which is worth around £5bn/year. 

My opinion

The reforms of Tier 4 have at their core the reduction of bogus students and bogus colleges. Many colleges sell immigration, not education. They provide a route for students to come to the UK, and many of these students are not interested in studying, but working. Theresa May has said that the new rules will not harm universities, but only bogus colleges. I think it is a good way to limit the abuses on the system
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-12820645 


REPORT: Migration Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) – UK

Key Findings

  • Longer and more bureaucratic path to ‘earned citizenship’: will newcomers contribute more to their communities, or less? 
  • Some of strongest anti-discrimination laws and equality policies. 
  • 2010 Equality Act makes law and duties simpler and easier to use. 
  • 21-year age limit for sponsors, spouses, partners: to fight forced marriage? 
  • UK policies for non-EU workers and families only half-way favourable: better career opportunities and more secure family life in CA and US. 
  • Schools in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland are some of best prepared for newcomer pupils, leading European countries of immigration. 
  • Strongest commitment to implement intercultural education. 

The numbers of asylum seekers fleeing North Africa are “fiction”, says French official

According to the French newspaper Le Monde, there has not been a massive influx of asylum seers in Europe as a result of the arabic spring. The President of the French Office fr Immigration and Integration stated that except the arrivals in Lampedusa, the mass influx advocated by the media is “fiction”. 

My opinion

I always find it interesting to read the press from different countries. To see what different papers focus on, how they tackle the same topic. I usually read French, British and some European (can I say that?) online news such as Le Monde, BBC, Presseurope and le Courrier International and Marianne. So know you know on what side of the political wing I am! I think we could never find such an article on BBC, could we?
The Lampedusa case should not be overlooked. What I mean is that even if other countries did not receive too many asylum seekers, Lampedusa continues to be the 'sanctuary' for ongoing numbers of people fleeing North Africa. Almost 2000 people arrived on the island on the 27th and 28th of March.

Author: Claudia Paraschivescu claudia.paraschivescu@gmail.com

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

News and Updates 8th of March

When the migrants choose to go back…

Eastern Europe, and mainly Bulgaria and Romania are countries which ‘export’ every year their nationals to the West. However, not everybody chooses to stay abroad.
The Bulgarian association ‘Here and There’ was set up by a group of Bulgarian students who, after having studied in Western countries, decided to return home. The starting point of the creation of the association was the moment when, back in Bulgaria, they realised that they had no friends to hang out with. “When you come home after a long stay abroad, it is not unusual to find that all your friends have disappeared, especially if you left the country just after completing secondary school. When I came back from London in 2008, I found myself in a social desert: Friday nights would come and go, and there would be no one to go for a drink with,” remarks Vania. They then decided to create a group of returning students who would meet and exchange ideas and experiences. Now they meet regularly and the most common topics they tackle are around the notion of cultural clash once back home. In Bulgaria “no one says hello or goodbye, and they hardly ever smile. I make a deliberate effort to greet everyone, including bus drivers who must think I’m completely crazy.”

My opinion
The association ‘Here and There’ is a good initiative of a motivated group who want to make a difference in the world of migration. Away from home, they did not forget the importance of the home country. Back in Bulgaria, they objectively realise that there are many things which one misses from what used to be the host country. I think the process of migration as such situates us, the migrants, somewhere in-between the sending and receiving country. This leads to a feeling of, what I call, identitary frustration.

European immigrants and UK social benefits

In 2004 the A8 countries (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia) joined the EU.  At this point in time the citizens of these country cannot claim any benefits if they do not have a job. They must have worked for 12 months in the UK in order to qualify for benefits. At the end of April all the transition arrangements applied to them will drop. As a result, A8 citizens will have access to British benefits. It is estimated that 100,000 migrants could claim tens of millions of pounds in benefits, as they will be allowed to apply for national government benefits such as jobseeker’s allowance, council tax benefit and housing benefit.
The Department for Work and Pensions said it had no choice but to remain in line with national and international obligations, but has insisted that protecting the benefit system from abuse was its "number one priority".

My opinion:
The EU calls for a common space where all its citizens are treated equally, no matter what European country they are from. The EU has a social based, whereas the UK is a liberal country where everything is related to money. The UK is part of the EU, but it does not share its social principles, where immigrants should have access to the same social and economic benefits as the Britons.
As a student in France (even before Romania joined the EU) I had the right to claim housing benefit. It was not seen as something we should be ashamed of, like in the UK. It was an entitlement. You are a student, you get it. Them, when Romania joined the EU, I even used to get a scholarship of around £300/month most of the students where entitled to if they did not live with their parents. Again, it did not create any stigmatisation.
The UK considers itself to be a very generous state. Well, it is not! Many people think that the immigrants are here to claim social benefits. Most of them do not claim anything as they are not entitled to. And if they are entitled to, that means that they work in and FOR this country, so they pay taxes. They give something to society, why would not the UK give something back to them as well? Why should everything turn around money?

For more on this topic go to: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12633382

Nick Clegg’s vision of multiculturalism

The issue at stake in the debate over multiculturalism is the segregation of communities. In that respect, Mr Cameron called for an end of multiculturalism.  However, Nick Clegg argued that “Where multiculturalism is held to mean more segregation, other communities leading parallel lives, it is clearly wrong. For me, multiculturalism has to be seen as a process by which people respect and communicate with each other, rather than build walls between each other. Welcoming diversity but resisting division: that's the kind of multiculturalism of an open, confident society. And the cultures in a multicultural society are not just ethnic or religious. Many of the cultural issues of the day cut right across these boundaries: gay rights; the role of women; identities across national borders; differing attitudes to marriage; the list goes on."

My opinion
Nick Clegg’s speech has been seen as a contrast of Cameron’s speech, where it was argued that multiculturalism had failed. His ideas of a multiculturalist society draws on an open Britain where liberal values defeat extremism. People should respect and communicate with eachother. In other words, they should tolerate each other and society should incorporate them. However, "How is a balance to be struck between the need to treat people equally, the need to treat people differently and the need to maintain shared values and social cohesion?" (Commission on Multi-Ethnic Britain 2000). Immigrants should learn the language of the host country, to start with. Then, they should be taught cultural classes. Life in the UK classes focus on history, politics and geography, they should also tackle the concepts of cultural clash and British culture. A way of doing this would be by gathering testimonials of various immigrants. Their experience in the UK could be the base of a textbook on British culture and cultural clash. This would ensure that immigrants would be absorbed by the host society, as they would know how to deal and cope with it. This would ensure that multiculturalism can be achieved, as the immigrants will understand and accept the host society. In an ideal world, the host society should ensure that its citizens are being taught since the youngest age that the immigrants are just foreigners, not strangers.

For more information on this topic go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12638017

Report: The integration of immigrants in Europe and North America

A new study published by the British Council and the Migration Policy Group shows that there are still disparities in how Europe is integrating the 20 million legal immigrants.
The major findings in this study include:
·         Political Participation Citizenship
Generally, migrants are still discouraged from becoming politically active or gaining full citizenship, although the trend in reforming countries is to open voting rights, dual nationality and birth right citizenship (e.g. Portugal, Greece, Luxembourg).
·         Education
Policies are generally failing to address the needs of a new generation of diverse students with few schools required to help teachers, migrant students, and parents address migrants’ specific needs. However there are several countries that are leading in this area (e.g. the Nordic countries, USA and Canada).
·         Labour Mobility
Most countries guarantee equal and secure rights to work for reunited families and long-term residents. However they are asked to fulfil more requirements that many nationals could not (income, age limits, tests without support to pass).
Nearly all countries guarantee legal migrants equal working conditions and access to unions once they begin working.  But nearly half exclude migrant workers, who pay full taxes, from parts of the social security system.
·         Anti-discrimination
Anti-discrimination laws are being strengthened in many countries (e.g. Sweden and the UK) although very few have strong policies and bodies to promote equality in society.

For more on this topic go to: http://ec.europa.eu/ewsi/en/news/newsdetail.cfm?ID_ITEMS=18815

Author: Claudia Paraschivescu claudia.paraschivescu@gmail.com

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

News and Updates 1st of March


Malta asks for help


As part of the EU, Malta needs to cope with a massive influx of refugees from Libya, as Gaddafi’s regime wishes to take control of the west of the country. Malta’s Prime Minister “has called upon the EU and the international community to assist Malta in its humanitarian mission”, which is now in a “sensitive and delicate” phase given its position as “a peace-living and bridge-building nation”.
As requested by UK, Germany, Austria, Brazil, Thailand, Vietnam and China, Malta is now being used as a transit point. In return, the government asks for help to get 183 Maltese citizens who are currently in Libya back to Malta.
Malta will now have to have the Libyans in the country until their applications will be processed. If they are successful in their applications and will be granted refugee status, thus protection, they will be entitled to stay in Malta.


My opinion

What the EU is doing is ‘passing the buck’ to a country which probably cannot say ‘No’. Yes, the UK, France and Germany, the most powerful member-states host many refugees already, but is it fair, to send the Libyans to Malta? Why not spreading them around various member states? This would make it more manageable, as every country will only get a small number of asylum seekers.  As a result of the ‘Arabic spring’, Italy, Spain, France, Cyprus, Malta and Greece presented joint proposals in favour of a common EU asylum policy which should be in place starting 2012 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12565214).

Europa and the Arabic spring. Does the EU foreign policy actually exist?

In Middle East and Maghreb people have died, are dying and will probably die. The EU has taken no attitude. It has been more concerned with the numbers of people fleeing their home countries and the numbers of asylum claims the EU might receive.
The statements issued by the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton, or the one following the meeting of the European Council of Ministers did not have any positive outcomes. Moreover, the spokesmen for migration of the European Commission expressed the EU’s concerns about what emigration could mean for the EU.
This could mean that the EU is trying to find its way in matters of foreign policy. The lack of interest and mobilisation only means that there is no common foreign policy.


My opinion

I used to be pro-Europe. I even studied European Studies. When I got to the UK everything stopped. I found more interesting the sound of the Masters’ degree entitled Globalisation and International Policy. I was not sure whether a EU foreign policy existed and this was way the EU deals (NOT) with what is happening in the Arabic world confirms my opinion. Moreover, I have always wanted to believe in the power of ‘human rights’. I have now realised that the EU does not hold to its principle which is “the universality and indivisibility of human rights”. It is sad to see that the EU does not make the difference anymore between migrants and refugees.
EU’s attitude is unpardonable. But what can you expect? There is no centralisation, no common policy. It is only driven by the interests of Germany (and France?). Europe’s aim is to keep third country nationals (citizens who do not hold the nationality of EU member states) outside the EU. It has been referred to in literature as ‘Fortress Europe’.

Immigration in the UK

The Office for National Statistics has released new numbers which show that in 2010, approximately 572,000 people entered the UK on a long-term basis and 346,000 emigrated. That means that net migration (the numbers of people entering the UK and those leaving the UK) has risen by 36%.
The Coalition is now in the process of reducing the numbers of immigrants from outside the EU. Immigration Minister Damian Green stated that their wish is “to bring net migration down to the tens of thousands by the end of this Parliament”.

For more on this topic: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12535437

My opinion

The Coalition has already put a cap on migration. There are now quotas in place on non-EU migrant workers. International students wanting to study in institutions offering below degree-level courses (colleges) will find it harder to come to the UK.
I am not sure what I should say about this topic. Is immigration a problem? Oh well… it could be argued both sides. The political economy of migration is a tricky one. However my view is that migrants can represent a problem for low-skilled native citizens who can see their jobs ‘stolen’ by happy-with-low-wages migrants. But these migrants contribute to the economy of the host country. They buy clothes, they pay taxes, they send their children to school… They do inject money in the economy of the host country. High skilled native citizens tend to be more tolerant towards immigrants, because they have nothing to fear. They have the security of a job, they have skills and they have a ‘voice’.
This being said, a friend of mine gave me a CD the other day on which he had recorded a BBC show called “The Day the Immigrants Left”. It was basically the story of some low-skilled Brits who were complaining that the only reason why they were unemployed was because “these Eastern Europeans steal our jobs”. The journalist convinced some English employees to let some Brits to work for a couple of days. What happened? Some of the unemployed Brits did not show up at the meeting point, others just gave up because the job it was too dull and difficult.
What is the lesson? Some of the migrants who work in West do those jobs that a native would not do because it is too dull, tedious and difficult…
What’s next? I don’t know. But I hope that (free) movement of persons will trigger tolerance. Acceptance of those immigrants who do not have a choice in their home countries and they only want to work hard in order to afford a decent life. That’s all they ask… a DECENT life, not even a GOOD life.
Migration should be managed, but… how?


France wants more international students

In the process of globalisation international education has become a business. France, which has just passed a low making it easier for the ‘sans papiers’ (undocumented migrants) to be send to their countries of origin is now considering attracting more international students.
In France education is free for everybody – both French people and international students. In the context of the post financial crisis, France, which hosts approximately 500,000 non-French students, is thinking to introduce tuition fees for foreign students. The average cost of one year at university is of approximately £8,000. Foreign students would pay 125% of this amount of money. The idea behind it is that 20% of students, who cannot afford university fees, would get funding to afford going to university.


My opinion

It is interesting to analyse the dynamics of the politics of migration. Close your doors to those who need you (Eg: those who are in danger in their home countries), and open the doors to those who can inject money in your economy.
The idea of tuition fees is, at the end of the idea, a good idea, as it would make French education more competitive. At this point in time it is losing out in front of countries such as the UK, the US or the NL. But since France is in the EU, the French Ministry of Education could not charge EU students and not charge French students, as EU citizens should be treated the same as the citizens of the EU country they are in. And I think that most of the foreign students, in France, come from EU countries. Exception make students from ex-French colonies such as North Africa or sub-Saharan Africa whose governments will probably enter bilateral agreements with French agreements.


Author: Claudia Paraschivescu claudia.paraschivescu@gmail.com